![]() Since WordPress 5.8, there is native support for WebP built-in to WordPress itself. That’s a 50% reduction in size, and we could see no difference in image quality whatsoever! 3. Combined size of images after converting to WebP: 2.0MB The combined size of all images uploaded in JPG format was 4.0MB, as seen below: Combined size of images prior to WebP conversion: 4.0MBĪfter converting all images to WebP using a lossy conversion, the combined size of all images was a mere 2.0MB. We also did a simple test ourselves and uploaded 10 different images to a demo page. WebP vs JPG: a quick and simple comparison However, even the lossy compression using WebP offers virtually no visual difference in terms of image quality, as can be seen in this sample gallery provided by Google. ![]() Lossless conversion of course means that there will be no loss of image quality whatsoever. WebP allows for both lossless and “lossy” compression of images. Google suggests using WebP in their PageSpeed Insights tool. Google thinks that the benefit of using WebP is so significant that they even suggest using WebP when testing one’s website using their PageSpeed Insights tool. The total file size of the average websites consists of about 50% images, so reducing file size of your images can have a big impact on the overall load time as well as scores such as web core vitals. It’s meant to be used as a replacement for JPG, PNG. WebP was developed by Google in an effort to make the web faster. Converting images to WebP without a plugin
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |